2008 Ford Taurus X vs. 1963 Nissan Cedric
To start off, 2008 Ford Taurus X is newer by 45 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Nissan Cedric. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Nissan Cedric would be higher. At 3,496 cc (6 cylinders), 2008 Ford Taurus X is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2008 Ford Taurus X (264 HP @ 6250 RPM) has 204 more horse power than 1963 Nissan Cedric. (60 HP @ 5000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2008 Ford Taurus X should accelerate faster than 1963 Nissan Cedric. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1963 Nissan Cedric weights approximately 8 kg more than 2008 Ford Taurus X.
Let's talk about torque, 2008 Ford Taurus X (338 Nm @ 4500 RPM) has 223 more torque (in Nm) than 1963 Nissan Cedric. (115 Nm @ 3200 RPM). This means 2008 Ford Taurus X will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1963 Nissan Cedric.
Compare all specifications:
| 2008 Ford Taurus X | 1963 Nissan Cedric | |
| Make | Ford | Nissan |
| Model | Taurus X | Cedric |
| Year Released | 2008 | 1963 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 3496 cc | 1488 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 264 HP | 60 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6250 RPM | 5000 RPM |
| Torque | 338 Nm | 115 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 4500 RPM | 3200 RPM |
| Vehicle Weight | 1077 kg | 1085 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5090 mm | 4420 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1910 mm | 1690 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1720 mm | 1530 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2870 mm | 2540 mm |
