2008 Ford Taurus X vs. 1982 Oldsmobile Cutlass
To start off, 2008 Ford Taurus X is newer by 26 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Oldsmobile Cutlass. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Oldsmobile Cutlass would be higher. At 3,790 cc (6 cylinders), 1982 Oldsmobile Cutlass is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1982 Oldsmobile Cutlass weights approximately 373 kg more than 2008 Ford Taurus X.
Because 2008 Ford Taurus X is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1982 Oldsmobile Cutlass. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2008 Ford Taurus X will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2008 Ford Taurus X | 1982 Oldsmobile Cutlass | |
Make | Ford | Oldsmobile |
Model | Taurus X | Cutlass |
Year Released | 2008 | 1982 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3496 cc | 3790 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 263 HP | 0 HP |
Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
Vehicle Weight | 1107 kg | 1480 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5090 mm | 5530 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1910 mm | 1830 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1720 mm | 1390 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2870 mm | 2760 mm |