2008 Ford Taurus X vs. 1992 Mercury Villager
To start off, 2008 Ford Taurus X is newer by 16 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1992 Mercury Villager. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1992 Mercury Villager would be higher. At 3,496 cc (6 cylinders), 2008 Ford Taurus X is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2008 Ford Taurus X (264 HP @ 6250 RPM) has 115 more horse power than 1992 Mercury Villager. (149 HP @ 4800 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2008 Ford Taurus X should accelerate faster than 1992 Mercury Villager. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1992 Mercury Villager weights approximately 723 kg more than 2008 Ford Taurus X.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2008 Ford Taurus X | 1992 Mercury Villager | |
Make | Ford | Mercury |
Model | Taurus X | Villager |
Year Released | 2008 | 1992 |
Body Type | Crossover | Minivan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3496 cc | 2960 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 264 HP | 149 HP |
Engine RPM | 6250 RPM | 4800 RPM |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Vehicle Weight | 1077 kg | 1800 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5090 mm | 4950 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1910 mm | 1910 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1720 mm | 1790 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2870 mm | 2860 mm |