2008 Ford Taurus X vs. 1999 Nissan C 52
To start off, 2008 Ford Taurus X is newer by 9 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1999 Nissan C 52. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1999 Nissan C 52 would be higher. Both 2008 Ford Taurus X and 1999 Nissan C 52 are equipped with a 3,496 cc engine. In terms of performance, 2008 Ford Taurus X (264 HP @ 6250 RPM) has 112 more horse power than 1999 Nissan C 52. (152 HP @ 3600 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2008 Ford Taurus X should accelerate faster than 1999 Nissan C 52. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1999 Nissan C 52 weights approximately 189 kg more than 2008 Ford Taurus X.
Let's talk about torque, 1999 Nissan C 52 (354 Nm) has 16 more torque (in Nm) than 2008 Ford Taurus X. (338 Nm). This means 1999 Nissan C 52 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2008 Ford Taurus X.
Compare all specifications:
| 2008 Ford Taurus X | 1999 Nissan C 52 | |
| Make | Ford | Nissan |
| Model | Taurus X | C 52 |
| Year Released | 2008 | 1999 |
| Engine Position | Front | Rear |
| Engine Size | 3496 cc | 3496 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | V |
| Horse Power | 264 HP | 152 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6250 RPM | 3600 RPM |
| Torque | 338 Nm | 354 Nm |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
| Number of Seats | 6 seats | 1 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1077 kg | 1266 kg |
| Wheelbase Size | 2870 mm | 2830 mm |
