2008 Ford Taurus X vs. 2003 Mazda 6
To start off, 2008 Ford Taurus X is newer by 5 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2003 Mazda 6. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2003 Mazda 6 would be higher. At 3,496 cc (6 cylinders), 2008 Ford Taurus X is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2008 Ford Taurus X (264 HP @ 6250 RPM) has 160 more horse power than 2003 Mazda 6. (104 HP @ 4000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2008 Ford Taurus X should accelerate faster than 2003 Mazda 6. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2003 Mazda 6 weights approximately 268 kg more than 2008 Ford Taurus X.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2008 Ford Taurus X (338 Nm) has 98 more torque (in Nm) than 2003 Mazda 6. (240 Nm). This means 2008 Ford Taurus X will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2003 Mazda 6.
Compare all specifications:
2008 Ford Taurus X | 2003 Mazda 6 | |
Make | Ford | Mazda |
Model | Taurus X | 6 |
Year Released | 2008 | 2003 |
Body Type | Crossover | Sedan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3496 cc | 1594 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 264 HP | 104 HP |
Engine RPM | 6250 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Torque | 338 Nm | 240 Nm |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Number of Seats | 6 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1077 kg | 1345 kg |
Wheelbase Size | 2870 mm | 2610 mm |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 12.4 L/100km | 7.2 L/100km |