2008 Ford Taurus X vs. 2012 Holden Commodore
To start off, 2012 Holden Commodore is newer by 4 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2008 Ford Taurus X. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2008 Ford Taurus X would be higher. At 5,976 cc (8 cylinders), 2012 Holden Commodore is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2012 Holden Commodore (360 HP) has 97 more horse power than 2008 Ford Taurus X. (263 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2012 Holden Commodore should accelerate faster than 2008 Ford Taurus X.
Because 2008 Ford Taurus X is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2012 Holden Commodore. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2008 Ford Taurus X will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2008 Ford Taurus X (338 Nm) has 48 more torque (in Nm) than 2012 Holden Commodore. (290 Nm). This means 2008 Ford Taurus X will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2012 Holden Commodore. 2008 Ford Taurus X has automatic transmission and 2012 Holden Commodore has manual transmission. 2012 Holden Commodore will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2008 Ford Taurus X will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
2008 Ford Taurus X | 2012 Holden Commodore | |
Make | Ford | Holden |
Model | Taurus X | Commodore |
Year Released | 2008 | 2012 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3496 cc | 5976 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Horse Power | 263 HP | 360 HP |
Torque | 338 Nm | 290 Nm |
Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Manual |
Number of Seats | 6 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 4 doors |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 13.1 L/100km | 14.4 L/100km |