2008 Geely CK vs. 1951 Jaguar C-Type
To start off, 2008 Geely CK is newer by 57 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1951 Jaguar C-Type. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1951 Jaguar C-Type would be higher. At 3,442 cc (6 cylinders), 1951 Jaguar C-Type is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2008 Geely CK weights approximately 75 kg more than 1951 Jaguar C-Type.
Because 1951 Jaguar C-Type is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1951 Jaguar C-Type. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2008 Geely CK, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1951 Jaguar C-Type (298 Nm @ 3900 RPM) has 170 more torque (in Nm) than 2008 Geely CK. (128 Nm @ 3400 RPM). This means 1951 Jaguar C-Type will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2008 Geely CK.
Compare all specifications:
| 2008 Geely CK | 1951 Jaguar C-Type | |
| Make | Geely | Jaguar |
| Model | CK | C-Type |
| Year Released | 2008 | 1951 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1498 cc | 3442 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 200 HP |
| Torque | 128 Nm | 298 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 3400 RPM | 3900 RPM |
| Engine Bore Size | 78.7 mm | 83.1 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 77 mm | 106 mm |
| Engine Compression Ratio | 9.8:1 | 9.0:1 |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
| Number of Doors | 4 doors | 2 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1040 kg | 965 kg |
| Wheelbase Size | 2440 mm | 2440 mm |
