2008 Geely CK vs. 1952 Rover P4
To start off, 2008 Geely CK is newer by 56 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1952 Rover P4. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1952 Rover P4 would be higher. At 2,101 cc (6 cylinders), 1952 Rover P4 is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1952 Rover P4 weights approximately 350 kg more than 2008 Geely CK.
Because 1952 Rover P4 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1952 Rover P4. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2008 Geely CK, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1952 Rover P4 (150 Nm @ 2500 RPM) has 40 more torque (in Nm) than 2008 Geely CK. (110 Nm @ 5200 RPM). This means 1952 Rover P4 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2008 Geely CK.
Compare all specifications:
| 2008 Geely CK | 1952 Rover P4 | |
| Make | Geely | Rover |
| Model | CK | P4 |
| Year Released | 2008 | 1952 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1342 cc | 2101 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 75 HP |
| Torque | 110 Nm | 150 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 5200 RPM | 2500 RPM |
| Engine Bore Size | 78.8 mm | 65.2 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 69 mm | 105 mm |
| Engine Compression Ratio | 9.3:1 | 7.3:1 |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 4 doors | 4 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1040 kg | 1390 kg |
| Wheelbase Size | 2440 mm | 2830 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 45 L | 52 L |
