2008 Geely CK vs. 1963 Triumph 2000
To start off, 2008 Geely CK is newer by 45 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Triumph 2000. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Triumph 2000 would be higher. At 1,998 cc (6 cylinders), 1963 Triumph 2000 is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1963 Triumph 2000 weights approximately 130 kg more than 2008 Geely CK.
Let's talk about torque, 1963 Triumph 2000 (158 Nm @ 3000 RPM) has 30 more torque (in Nm) than 2008 Geely CK. (128 Nm @ 3400 RPM). This means 1963 Triumph 2000 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2008 Geely CK.
Compare all specifications:
| 2008 Geely CK | 1963 Triumph 2000 | |
| Make | Geely | Triumph |
| Model | CK | 2000 |
| Year Released | 2008 | 1963 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1498 cc | 1998 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 89 HP |
| Torque | 128 Nm | 158 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 3400 RPM | 3000 RPM |
| Engine Bore Size | 78.7 mm | 74.8 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 77 mm | 76 mm |
| Engine Compression Ratio | 9.8:1 | 9.3:1 |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 4 doors | 4 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1040 kg | 1170 kg |
| Wheelbase Size | 2440 mm | 2700 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 45 L | 64 L |
