2008 Geely CK vs. 1966 Holden HD
To start off, 2008 Geely CK is newer by 42 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 Holden HD. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 Holden HD would be higher. At 2,930 cc (6 cylinders), 1966 Holden HD is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1966 Holden HD weights approximately 160 kg more than 2008 Geely CK.
Because 1966 Holden HD is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1966 Holden HD. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2008 Geely CK, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1966 Holden HD (237 Nm @ 2200 RPM) has 127 more torque (in Nm) than 2008 Geely CK. (110 Nm @ 5200 RPM). This means 1966 Holden HD will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2008 Geely CK.
Compare all specifications:
| 2008 Geely CK | 1966 Holden HD | |
| Make | Geely | Holden |
| Model | CK | HD |
| Year Released | 2008 | 1966 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1340 cc | 2930 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 122 HP |
| Torque | 110 Nm | 237 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 5200 RPM | 2200 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Vehicle Weight | 1040 kg | 1200 kg |
| Wheelbase Size | 2440 mm | 2700 mm |
