2008 Geely CK vs. 1981 Mazda Cosmo
To start off, 2008 Geely CK is newer by 27 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1981 Mazda Cosmo. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1981 Mazda Cosmo would be higher. At 1,970 cc (4 cylinders), 1981 Mazda Cosmo is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1981 Mazda Cosmo weights approximately 58 kg more than 2008 Geely CK.
Because 1981 Mazda Cosmo is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1981 Mazda Cosmo. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2008 Geely CK, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1981 Mazda Cosmo (167 Nm @ 3300 RPM) has 39 more torque (in Nm) than 2008 Geely CK. (128 Nm @ 3400 RPM). This means 1981 Mazda Cosmo will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2008 Geely CK.
Compare all specifications:
2008 Geely CK | 1981 Mazda Cosmo | |
Make | Geely | Mazda |
Model | CK | Cosmo |
Year Released | 2008 | 1981 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1498 cc | 1970 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 102 HP |
Torque | 128 Nm | 167 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3400 RPM | 3300 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 78.7 mm | 80 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 77 mm | 98 mm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1040 kg | 1098 kg |
Wheelbase Size | 2440 mm | 2620 mm |