2008 Geely CK vs. 1995 Rover 200
To start off, 2008 Geely CK is newer by 13 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1995 Rover 200. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1995 Rover 200 would be higher. At 1,796 cc (4 cylinders), 1995 Rover 200 is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1995 Rover 200 weights approximately 40 kg more than 2008 Geely CK.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1995 Rover 200 (180 Nm @ 4500 RPM) has 52 more torque (in Nm) than 2008 Geely CK. (128 Nm @ 3400 RPM). This means 1995 Rover 200 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2008 Geely CK.
Compare all specifications:
2008 Geely CK | 1995 Rover 200 | |
Make | Geely | Rover |
Model | CK | 200 |
Year Released | 2008 | 1995 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1498 cc | 1796 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 144 HP |
Torque | 128 Nm | 180 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3400 RPM | 4500 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 78.7 mm | 80 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 77 mm | 89.3 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 9.8:1 | 10.5:1 |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 3 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1040 kg | 1080 kg |
Wheelbase Size | 2440 mm | 2510 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 45 L | 50 L |