2008 Geely CK vs. 2004 Toyota Tundra
To start off, 2008 Geely CK is newer by 4 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2004 Toyota Tundra. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2004 Toyota Tundra would be higher. At 3,376 cc (6 cylinders), 2004 Toyota Tundra is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Toyota Tundra weights approximately 740 kg more than 2008 Geely CK.
Because 2004 Toyota Tundra is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2004 Toyota Tundra. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2008 Geely CK, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2004 Toyota Tundra (298 Nm) has 170 more torque (in Nm) than 2008 Geely CK. (128 Nm). This means 2004 Toyota Tundra will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2008 Geely CK.
Compare all specifications:
| 2008 Geely CK | 2004 Toyota Tundra | |
| Make | Geely | Toyota |
| Model | CK | Tundra |
| Year Released | 2008 | 2004 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1498 cc | 3376 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 190 HP |
| Torque | 128 Nm | 298 Nm |
| Engine Bore Size | 78.7 mm | 93 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 77 mm | 82 mm |
| Engine Compression Ratio | 9.8:1 | 9.6:1 |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 3 seats |
| Number of Doors | 4 doors | 2 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1040 kg | 1780 kg |
| Wheelbase Size | 2440 mm | 3270 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 45 L | 100 L |
