2008 GMC Acadia vs. 2006 Isuzu I-350
To start off, 2008 GMC Acadia is newer by 2 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2006 Isuzu I-350. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2006 Isuzu I-350 would be higher. At 3,600 cc (6 cylinders), 2008 GMC Acadia is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2008 GMC Acadia (275 HP @ 6600 RPM) has 55 more horse power than 2006 Isuzu I-350. (220 HP @ 5600 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2008 GMC Acadia should accelerate faster than 2006 Isuzu I-350.
Both vehicles are four wheel drive (4WD) - it offers better handling, traction, and control in all driving conditions compared with front wheel drive or rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2008 GMC Acadia (340 Nm @ 3200 RPM) has 35 more torque (in Nm) than 2006 Isuzu I-350. (305 Nm @ 2800 RPM). This means 2008 GMC Acadia will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2006 Isuzu I-350.
Compare all specifications:
2008 GMC Acadia | 2006 Isuzu I-350 | |
Make | GMC | Isuzu |
Model | Acadia | I-350 |
Year Released | 2008 | 2006 |
Body Type | SUV | Pickup |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3600 cc | 3458 cc |
Horse Power | 275 HP | 220 HP |
Engine RPM | 6600 RPM | 5600 RPM |
Torque | 340 Nm | 305 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3200 RPM | 2800 RPM |
Drive Type | 4WD | 4WD |
Number of Seats | 8 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Length | 5100 mm | 5270 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1990 mm | 1750 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1780 mm | 1730 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3030 mm | 3200 mm |
Fuel Consumption | 10.7 L/100km | 10.7 L/100km |
Fuel Consumption City | 14.7 L/100km | 13.8 L/100km |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 13.1 L/100km | 12.4 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 83 L | 74 L |