2008 GMC Canyon vs. 2012 Holden Commodore
To start off, 2012 Holden Commodore is newer by 4 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2008 GMC Canyon. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2008 GMC Canyon would be higher. At 2,901 cc (4 cylinders), 2008 GMC Canyon is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2012 Holden Commodore (240 HP) has 55 more horse power than 2008 GMC Canyon. (185 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2012 Holden Commodore should accelerate faster than 2008 GMC Canyon.
Because 2008 GMC Canyon is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2012 Holden Commodore. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2008 GMC Canyon will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2008 GMC Canyon (259 Nm) has 19 more torque (in Nm) than 2012 Holden Commodore. (240 Nm). This means 2008 GMC Canyon will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2012 Holden Commodore.
Compare all specifications:
| 2008 GMC Canyon | 2012 Holden Commodore | |
| Make | GMC | Holden |
| Model | Canyon | Commodore |
| Year Released | 2008 | 2012 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2901 cc | 2564 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 185 HP | 240 HP |
| Torque | 259 Nm | 240 Nm |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 3 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
| Fuel Consumption Overall | 13.8 L/100km | 10.9 L/100km |
