2008 GMC Sierra vs. 1965 Rolls-Royce Silver Cloud
To start off, 2008 GMC Sierra is newer by 43 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1965 Rolls-Royce Silver Cloud. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1965 Rolls-Royce Silver Cloud would be higher. At 6,230 cc (8 cylinders), 1965 Rolls-Royce Silver Cloud is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2008 GMC Sierra weights approximately 41 kg more than 1965 Rolls-Royce Silver Cloud.
Because 2008 GMC Sierra is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1965 Rolls-Royce Silver Cloud. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2008 GMC Sierra will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2008 GMC Sierra | 1965 Rolls-Royce Silver Cloud | |
Make | GMC | Rolls-Royce |
Model | Sierra | Silver Cloud |
Year Released | 2008 | 1965 |
Body Type | Pickup | Sedan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4298 cc | 6230 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 195 HP | 0 HP |
Engine Compression Ratio | 9.2:1 | 8.9:1 |
Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 3 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 2141 kg | 2100 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5710 mm | 5380 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2040 mm | 1890 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1880 mm | 1630 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3030 mm | 3130 mm |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 13.1 L/100km | 15.4 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 98 L | 81 L |