2008 Holden Commodore vs. 2002 Chrysler Voyager

To start off, 2008 Holden Commodore is newer by 6 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2002 Chrysler Voyager. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2002 Chrysler Voyager would be higher. At 5,976 cc (8 cylinders), 2008 Holden Commodore is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2008 Holden Commodore (360 HP) has 215 more horse power than 2002 Chrysler Voyager. (145 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2008 Holden Commodore should accelerate faster than 2002 Chrysler Voyager.

Because 2008 Holden Commodore is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2008 Holden Commodore. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2002 Chrysler Voyager, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2008 Holden Commodore (290 Nm) has 79 more torque (in Nm) than 2002 Chrysler Voyager. (211 Nm). This means 2008 Holden Commodore will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2002 Chrysler Voyager. 2002 Chrysler Voyager has automatic transmission and 2008 Holden Commodore has manual transmission. 2008 Holden Commodore will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2002 Chrysler Voyager will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.

Compare all specifications: