2008 Holden UTE vs. 1975 Mitsubishi Celeste
To start off, 2008 Holden UTE is newer by 33 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1975 Mitsubishi Celeste. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1975 Mitsubishi Celeste would be higher. At 6,000 cc (8 cylinders), 2008 Holden UTE is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2008 Holden UTE (357 HP) has 272 more horse power than 1975 Mitsubishi Celeste. (85 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2008 Holden UTE should accelerate faster than 1975 Mitsubishi Celeste.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2008 Holden UTE (530 Nm) has 399 more torque (in Nm) than 1975 Mitsubishi Celeste. (131 Nm). This means 2008 Holden UTE will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1975 Mitsubishi Celeste. 1975 Mitsubishi Celeste has automatic transmission and 2008 Holden UTE has manual transmission. 2008 Holden UTE will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 1975 Mitsubishi Celeste will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
| 2008 Holden UTE | 1975 Mitsubishi Celeste | |
| Make | Holden | Mitsubishi |
| Model | UTE | Celeste |
| Year Released | 2008 | 1975 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 6000 cc | 1595 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 357 HP | 85 HP |
| Torque | 530 Nm | 131 Nm |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
