2008 Holden UTE vs. 1989 Holden Camira

To start off, 2008 Holden UTE is newer by 19 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1989 Holden Camira. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1989 Holden Camira would be higher. At 6,000 cc (8 cylinders), 2008 Holden UTE is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2008 Holden UTE (357 HP) has 243 more horse power than 1989 Holden Camira. (114 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2008 Holden UTE should accelerate faster than 1989 Holden Camira.

Because 2008 Holden UTE is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2008 Holden UTE. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1989 Holden Camira, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2008 Holden UTE (530 Nm) has 354 more torque (in Nm) than 1989 Holden Camira. (176 Nm). This means 2008 Holden UTE will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1989 Holden Camira. 1989 Holden Camira has automatic transmission and 2008 Holden UTE has manual transmission. 2008 Holden UTE will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 1989 Holden Camira will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.

Compare all specifications:

2008 Holden UTE 1989 Holden Camira
Make Holden Holden
Model UTE Camira
Year Released 2008 1989
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 6000 cc 1998 cc
Engine Cylinders 8 cylinders 4 cylinders
Engine Type V in-line
Horse Power 357 HP 114 HP
Torque 530 Nm 176 Nm
Fuel Type Gasoline Gasoline
Drive Type Rear Front
Transmission Type Manual Automatic