2008 Holden UTE vs. 2011 Mitsubishi RVR
To start off, 2011 Mitsubishi RVR is newer by 3 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2008 Holden UTE. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2008 Holden UTE would be higher. At 6,000 cc (8 cylinders), 2008 Holden UTE is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2008 Holden UTE (357 HP) has 209 more horse power than 2011 Mitsubishi RVR. (148 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2008 Holden UTE should accelerate faster than 2011 Mitsubishi RVR.
Because 2008 Holden UTE is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2008 Holden UTE. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2011 Mitsubishi RVR, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2008 Holden UTE (530 Nm) has 334 more torque (in Nm) than 2011 Mitsubishi RVR. (196 Nm). This means 2008 Holden UTE will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2011 Mitsubishi RVR.
Compare all specifications:
2008 Holden UTE | 2011 Mitsubishi RVR | |
Make | Holden | Mitsubishi |
Model | UTE | RVR |
Year Released | 2008 | 2011 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 6000 cc | 2000 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 357 HP | 148 HP |
Torque | 530 Nm | 196 Nm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |