2008 Honda Accord vs. 1978 Mazda 323
To start off, 2008 Honda Accord is newer by 30 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1978 Mazda 323. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1978 Mazda 323 would be higher. At 2,204 cc (4 cylinders), 2008 Honda Accord is equipped with a bigger engine.
Because 1978 Mazda 323 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1978 Mazda 323. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2008 Honda Accord, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 1978 Mazda 323 has automatic transmission and 2008 Honda Accord has manual transmission. 2008 Honda Accord will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 1978 Mazda 323 will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
2008 Honda Accord | 1978 Mazda 323 | |
Make | Honda | Mazda |
Model | Accord | 323 |
Year Released | 2008 | 1978 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2204 cc | 1415 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 138 HP | 0 HP |
Fuel Type | Diesel | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Length | 4760 mm | 4050 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1770 mm | 1600 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1480 mm | 1430 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2730 mm | 2320 mm |