2008 Honda Civic vs. 1994 Rover 800
To start off, 2008 Honda Civic is newer by 14 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1994 Rover 800. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1994 Rover 800 would be higher. At 2,675 cc (6 cylinders), 1994 Rover 800 is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1994 Rover 800 weights approximately 399 kg more than 2008 Honda Civic.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1994 Rover 800 (225 Nm @ 4500 RPM) has 90 more torque (in Nm) than 2008 Honda Civic. (135 Nm @ 4200 RPM). This means 1994 Rover 800 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2008 Honda Civic.
Compare all specifications:
2008 Honda Civic | 1994 Rover 800 | |
Make | Honda | Rover |
Model | Civic | 800 |
Year Released | 2008 | 1994 |
Body Type | Sedan | Coupe |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1493 cc | 2675 cc |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 167 HP |
Torque | 135 Nm | 225 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4200 RPM | 4500 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 75 mm | 87 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 84.5 mm | 75 mm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1125 kg | 1524 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4940 mm | 4890 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1480 mm | 1400 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2630 mm | 2750 mm |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 9.2 L/100km | 4.8 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 50 L | 68 L |