2008 Honda CR-V vs. 1960 Mazda R 360
To start off, 2008 Honda CR-V is newer by 48 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1960 Mazda R 360. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1960 Mazda R 360 would be higher. At 1,998 cc (4 cylinders), 2008 Honda CR-V is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2008 Honda CR-V weights approximately 1153 kg more than 1960 Mazda R 360.
Because 2008 Honda CR-V is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1960 Mazda R 360. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2008 Honda CR-V will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2008 Honda CR-V (191 Nm @ 4000 RPM) has 169 more torque (in Nm) than 1960 Mazda R 360. (22 Nm @ 4000 RPM). This means 2008 Honda CR-V will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1960 Mazda R 360.
Compare all specifications:
| 2008 Honda CR-V | 1960 Mazda R 360 | |
| Make | Honda | Mazda |
| Model | CR-V | R 360 |
| Year Released | 2008 | 1960 |
| Body Type | SUV | Coupe |
| Engine Size | 1998 cc | 355 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 2 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 16 HP |
| Torque | 191 Nm | 22 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 4000 RPM | 4000 RPM |
| Engine Bore Size | 86 mm | 60 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 86 mm | 63 mm |
| Top Speed | 184 km/hour | 80 km/hour |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
| Number of Doors | 5 doors | 2 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1533 kg | 380 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4940 mm | 2990 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1480 mm | 1300 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2630 mm | 1770 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 58 L | 55 L |
