2008 Honda CR-V vs. 1960 Toyota Master RR
To start off, 2008 Honda CR-V is newer by 48 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1960 Toyota Master RR. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1960 Toyota Master RR would be higher. At 1,998 cc (4 cylinders), 2008 Honda CR-V is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2008 Honda CR-V (148 HP) has 108 more horse power than 1960 Toyota Master RR. (40 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2008 Honda CR-V should accelerate faster than 1960 Toyota Master RR. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2008 Honda CR-V weights approximately 260 kg more than 1960 Toyota Master RR. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2008 Honda CR-V is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1960 Toyota Master RR. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2008 Honda CR-V will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2008 Honda CR-V | 1960 Toyota Master RR | |
Make | Honda | Toyota |
Model | CR-V | Master RR |
Year Released | 2008 | 1960 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1998 cc | 1453 cc |
Horse Power | 148 HP | 40 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline - Premium | Gasoline |
Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1470 kg | 1210 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4570 mm | 4280 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1790 mm | 1680 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1720 mm | 1560 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2640 mm | 2540 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 58 L | 75 L |