2008 Honda CR-V vs. 1965 Jaguar MK II
To start off, 2008 Honda CR-V is newer by 43 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1965 Jaguar MK II. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1965 Jaguar MK II would be higher. At 2,483 cc (6 cylinders), 1965 Jaguar MK II is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2008 Honda CR-V weights approximately 112 kg more than 1965 Jaguar MK II.
Because 2008 Honda CR-V is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1965 Jaguar MK II. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2008 Honda CR-V will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1965 Jaguar MK II (195 Nm @ 2000 RPM) has 5 more torque (in Nm) than 2008 Honda CR-V. (190 Nm @ 4000 RPM). This means 1965 Jaguar MK II will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2008 Honda CR-V.
Compare all specifications:
2008 Honda CR-V | 1965 Jaguar MK II | |
Make | Honda | Jaguar |
Model | CR-V | MK II |
Year Released | 2008 | 1965 |
Body Type | SUV | Sedan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1998 cc | 2483 cc |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 120 HP |
Torque | 190 Nm | 195 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4000 RPM | 2000 RPM |
Engine Compression Ratio | 9.8:1 | 8.0:1 |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1562 kg | 1450 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4640 mm | 5000 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1720 mm | 1600 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2630 mm | 2900 mm |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 13.7 L/100km | 11.6 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 58 L | 63 L |