2008 Honda CR-V vs. 1978 Datsun 260Z
To start off, 2008 Honda CR-V is newer by 30 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1978 Datsun 260Z. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1978 Datsun 260Z would be higher. At 2,565 cc (6 cylinders), 1978 Datsun 260Z is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2008 Honda CR-V weights approximately 362 kg more than 1978 Datsun 260Z.
Because 2008 Honda CR-V is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1978 Datsun 260Z. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2008 Honda CR-V will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1978 Datsun 260Z (213 Nm @ 4400 RPM) has 23 more torque (in Nm) than 2008 Honda CR-V. (190 Nm @ 4000 RPM). This means 1978 Datsun 260Z will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2008 Honda CR-V.
Compare all specifications:
2008 Honda CR-V | 1978 Datsun 260Z | |
Make | Honda | Datsun |
Model | CR-V | 260Z |
Year Released | 2008 | 1978 |
Body Type | SUV | Hatchback |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1998 cc | 2565 cc |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 163 HP |
Torque | 190 Nm | 213 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4000 RPM | 4400 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 86 mm | 83 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 86 mm | 79 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 9.8:1 | 8.3:1 |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline - Premium |
Top Speed | 165 km/hour | 204 km/hour |
Acceleration 0-100mph | 13.8 seconds | 8 seconds |
Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 3 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1562 kg | 1200 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4640 mm | 4450 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1720 mm | 1290 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2630 mm | 2581 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 58 L | 60 L |