2008 Honda CR-V vs. 1982 Toyota Celica
To start off, 2008 Honda CR-V is newer by 26 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Toyota Celica. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Toyota Celica would be higher. At 2,563 cc, 1982 Toyota Celica is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2008 Honda CR-V (166 HP @ 5800 RPM) has 47 more horse power than 1982 Toyota Celica. (119 HP @ 5400 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2008 Honda CR-V should accelerate faster than 1982 Toyota Celica. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2008 Honda CR-V weights approximately 176 kg more than 1982 Toyota Celica. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2008 Honda CR-V (218 Nm @ 4200 RPM) has 3 more torque (in Nm) than 1982 Toyota Celica. (215 Nm @ 3600 RPM). This means 2008 Honda CR-V will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1982 Toyota Celica.
Compare all specifications:
2008 Honda CR-V | 1982 Toyota Celica | |
Make | Honda | Toyota |
Model | CR-V | Celica |
Year Released | 2008 | 1982 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2354 cc | 2563 cc |
Horse Power | 166 HP | 119 HP |
Engine RPM | 5800 RPM | 5400 RPM |
Torque | 218 Nm | 215 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4200 RPM | 3600 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1356 kg | 1180 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4530 mm | 4610 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1830 mm | 1660 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1690 mm | 1320 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2630 mm | 2640 mm |