2008 Honda CR-V vs. 1994 Nissan Cima
To start off, 2008 Honda CR-V is newer by 14 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1994 Nissan Cima. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1994 Nissan Cima would be higher. At 3,000 cc (6 cylinders), 1994 Nissan Cima is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2008 Honda CR-V weights approximately 3 kg more than 1994 Nissan Cima.
Because 2008 Honda CR-V is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1994 Nissan Cima. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2008 Honda CR-V will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2008 Honda CR-V | 1994 Nissan Cima | |
| Make | Honda | Nissan |
| Model | CR-V | Cima |
| Year Released | 2008 | 1994 |
| Body Type | SUV | Sedan |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1998 cc | 3000 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 0 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 5 doors | 4 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1533 kg | 1530 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4940 mm | 4880 mm |
