2008 Honda CR-V vs. 1996 Nissan Cima
To start off, 2008 Honda CR-V is newer by 12 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1996 Nissan Cima. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1996 Nissan Cima would be higher. At 3,000 cc (6 cylinders), 1996 Nissan Cima is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2008 Honda CR-V weights approximately 78 kg more than 1996 Nissan Cima.
Because 2008 Honda CR-V is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1996 Nissan Cima. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2008 Honda CR-V will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2008 Honda CR-V | 1996 Nissan Cima | |
Make | Honda | Nissan |
Model | CR-V | Cima |
Year Released | 2008 | 1996 |
Body Type | SUV | Sedan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2204 cc | 3000 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 138 HP | 0 HP |
Fuel Type | Diesel | Gasoline |
Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1608 kg | 1530 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4530 mm | 4880 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1830 mm | 1770 mm |