2008 Honda CR-V vs. 1996 Rover 400

To start off, 2008 Honda CR-V is newer by 12 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1996 Rover 400. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1996 Rover 400 would be higher. At 2,204 cc (4 cylinders), 2008 Honda CR-V is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2008 Honda CR-V (138 HP @ 4000 RPM) has 29 more horse power than 1996 Rover 400. (109 HP @ 6000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2008 Honda CR-V should accelerate faster than 1996 Rover 400.

Because 2008 Honda CR-V is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1996 Rover 400. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2008 Honda CR-V will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2008 Honda CR-V (341 Nm @ 2000 RPM) has 196 more torque (in Nm) than 1996 Rover 400. (145 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 2008 Honda CR-V will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1996 Rover 400.

Compare all specifications:

2008 Honda CR-V 1996 Rover 400
Make Honda Rover
Model CR-V 400
Year Released 2008 1996
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 2204 cc 1589 cc
Engine Cylinders 4 cylinders 4 cylinders
Engine Type in-line in-line
Valves per Cylinder 4 valves 4 valves
Horse Power 138 HP 109 HP
Engine RPM 4000 RPM 6000 RPM
Torque 341 Nm 145 Nm
Torque RPM 2000 RPM 3000 RPM
Engine Bore Size 85 mm 80 mm
Engine Stroke Size 97.1 mm 79 mm
Fuel Type Diesel Gasoline
Drive Type 4WD Front
Transmission Type Manual Manual
Number of Seats 5 seats 5 seats
Vehicle Length 4530 mm 4370 mm
Vehicle Width 1830 mm 1690 mm
Vehicle Height 1680 mm 1410 mm
Wheelbase Size 2640 mm 2560 mm