2008 Honda CR-V vs. 1996 Rover 400
To start off, 2008 Honda CR-V is newer by 12 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1996 Rover 400. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1996 Rover 400 would be higher. At 2,204 cc (4 cylinders), 2008 Honda CR-V is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2008 Honda CR-V (138 HP @ 4000 RPM) has 29 more horse power than 1996 Rover 400. (109 HP @ 6000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2008 Honda CR-V should accelerate faster than 1996 Rover 400.
Because 2008 Honda CR-V is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1996 Rover 400. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2008 Honda CR-V will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2008 Honda CR-V (341 Nm @ 2000 RPM) has 196 more torque (in Nm) than 1996 Rover 400. (145 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 2008 Honda CR-V will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1996 Rover 400.
Compare all specifications:
2008 Honda CR-V | 1996 Rover 400 | |
Make | Honda | Rover |
Model | CR-V | 400 |
Year Released | 2008 | 1996 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2204 cc | 1589 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 138 HP | 109 HP |
Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 341 Nm | 145 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2000 RPM | 3000 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 85 mm | 80 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 97.1 mm | 79 mm |
Fuel Type | Diesel | Gasoline |
Drive Type | 4WD | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Length | 4530 mm | 4370 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1830 mm | 1690 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1680 mm | 1410 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2640 mm | 2560 mm |