2008 Honda CR-V vs. 1996 Volkswagen Fusca
To start off, 2008 Honda CR-V is newer by 12 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1996 Volkswagen Fusca. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1996 Volkswagen Fusca would be higher. At 1,998 cc, 2008 Honda CR-V is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2008 Honda CR-V weights approximately 742 kg more than 1996 Volkswagen Fusca.
Because 2008 Honda CR-V is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1996 Volkswagen Fusca. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2008 Honda CR-V will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2008 Honda CR-V (190 Nm @ 4000 RPM) has 85 more torque (in Nm) than 1996 Volkswagen Fusca. (105 Nm @ 2600 RPM). This means 2008 Honda CR-V will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1996 Volkswagen Fusca. 2008 Honda CR-V has automatic transmission and 1996 Volkswagen Fusca has manual transmission. 1996 Volkswagen Fusca will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2008 Honda CR-V will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
2008 Honda CR-V | 1996 Volkswagen Fusca | |
Make | Honda | Volkswagen |
Model | CR-V | Fusca |
Year Released | 2008 | 1996 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1998 cc | 1585 cc |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 52 HP |
Torque | 190 Nm | 105 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4000 RPM | 2600 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1562 kg | 820 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4640 mm | 4060 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1720 mm | 1510 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2630 mm | 2410 mm |