2008 Honda CR-V vs. 2001 Toyota Opa
To start off, 2008 Honda CR-V is newer by 7 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2001 Toyota Opa. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2001 Toyota Opa would be higher. At 2,000 cc (4 cylinders), 2001 Toyota Opa is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2008 Honda CR-V weights approximately 332 kg more than 2001 Toyota Opa.
Because 2008 Honda CR-V is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2001 Toyota Opa. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2008 Honda CR-V will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2001 Toyota Opa (202 Nm) has 12 more torque (in Nm) than 2008 Honda CR-V. (190 Nm). This means 2001 Toyota Opa will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2008 Honda CR-V.
Compare all specifications:
2008 Honda CR-V | 2001 Toyota Opa | |
Make | Honda | Toyota |
Model | CR-V | Opa |
Year Released | 2008 | 2001 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1998 cc | 2000 cc |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 150 HP |
Torque | 190 Nm | 202 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 86 mm | 86.1 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 86 mm | 86.1 mm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | 4WD | Front |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1562 kg | 1230 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4640 mm | 4260 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1720 mm | 1530 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2630 mm | 2800 mm |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 13.7 L/100km | 4.3 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 58 L | 87 L |