2008 Honda CR-V vs. 2013 Ferrari California
To start off, 2013 Ferrari California is newer by 5 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2008 Honda CR-V. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2008 Honda CR-V would be higher. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2013 Ferrari California weights approximately 22 kg more than 2008 Honda CR-V.
Because 2008 Honda CR-V is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2013 Ferrari California. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2008 Honda CR-V will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2013 Ferrari California (504 Nm) has 164 more torque (in Nm) than 2008 Honda CR-V. (340 Nm). This means 2013 Ferrari California will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2008 Honda CR-V.
Compare all specifications:
2008 Honda CR-V | 2013 Ferrari California | |
Make | Honda | Ferrari |
Model | CR-V | California |
Year Released | 2008 | 2013 |
Body Type | SUV | Coupe |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 138 HP | 0 HP |
Torque | 340 Nm | 504 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 85 mm | 94 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 97.1 mm | 77 mm |
Fuel Type | Diesel | Premium |
Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | 6-speed manual |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1687 kg | 1709 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4530 mm | 4562 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1830 mm | 1902 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1680 mm | 1308 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2640 mm | 2670 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 58 L | 78 L |