2008 Honda Fit vs. 1956 Isuzu Minx
To start off, 2008 Honda Fit is newer by 52 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1956 Isuzu Minx. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1956 Isuzu Minx would be higher. At 1,497 cc (4 cylinders), 2008 Honda Fit is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2008 Honda Fit (109 HP @ 5800 RPM) has 72 more horse power than 1956 Isuzu Minx. (37 HP @ 4200 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2008 Honda Fit should accelerate faster than 1956 Isuzu Minx. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2008 Honda Fit weights approximately 314 kg more than 1956 Isuzu Minx. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1956 Isuzu Minx is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1956 Isuzu Minx. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2008 Honda Fit, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2008 Honda Fit | 1956 Isuzu Minx | |
Make | Honda | Isuzu |
Model | Fit | Minx |
Year Released | 2008 | 1956 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1497 cc | 1265 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 109 HP | 37 HP |
Engine RPM | 5800 RPM | 4200 RPM |
Torque RPM | 4800 RPM | 2200 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 1280 kg | 966 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4000 mm | 4070 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1690 mm | 1580 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1530 mm | 1530 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2460 mm | 2370 mm |