2008 Honda HR-V vs. 1952 Rover P4
To start off, 2008 Honda HR-V is newer by 56 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1952 Rover P4. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1952 Rover P4 would be higher. At 2,101 cc (6 cylinders), 1952 Rover P4 is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1952 Rover P4 weights approximately 133 kg more than 2008 Honda HR-V.
Because 2008 Honda HR-V is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1952 Rover P4. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2008 Honda HR-V will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1952 Rover P4 (150 Nm @ 2500 RPM) has 15 more torque (in Nm) than 2008 Honda HR-V. (135 Nm @ 3500 RPM). This means 1952 Rover P4 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2008 Honda HR-V.
Compare all specifications:
2008 Honda HR-V | 1952 Rover P4 | |
Make | Honda | Rover |
Model | HR-V | P4 |
Year Released | 2008 | 1952 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1590 cc | 2101 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 75 HP |
Torque | 135 Nm | 150 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3500 RPM | 2500 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 75 mm | 65.2 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 90 mm | 105 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 9.4:1 | 7.3:1 |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1257 kg | 1390 kg |
Vehicle Width | 1690 mm | 1670 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2460 mm | 2830 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 55 L | 52 L |