2008 Honda HR-V vs. 1952 Triumph Renown
To start off, 2008 Honda HR-V is newer by 56 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1952 Triumph Renown. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1952 Triumph Renown would be higher. At 1,997 cc (4 cylinders), 1952 Triumph Renown is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2008 Honda HR-V (122 HP @ 6600 RPM) has 56 more horse power than 1952 Triumph Renown. (66 HP @ 4200 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2008 Honda HR-V should accelerate faster than 1952 Triumph Renown. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2008 Honda HR-V weights approximately 37 kg more than 1952 Triumph Renown. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 1952 Triumph Renown (147 Nm @ 2000 RPM) has 3 more torque (in Nm) than 2008 Honda HR-V. (144 Nm @ 4900 RPM). This means 1952 Triumph Renown will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2008 Honda HR-V.
Compare all specifications:
2008 Honda HR-V | 1952 Triumph Renown | |
Make | Honda | Triumph |
Model | HR-V | Renown |
Year Released | 2008 | 1952 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1590 cc | 1997 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 122 HP | 66 HP |
Engine RPM | 6600 RPM | 4200 RPM |
Torque | 144 Nm | 147 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4900 RPM | 2000 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 75 mm | 85 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 90 mm | 92 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 10.0:1 | 9.0:1 |
Fuel Type | Gasoline - Premium | Gasoline |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1317 kg | 1280 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4120 mm | 4450 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1700 mm | 1630 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1680 mm | 1610 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2460 mm | 2750 mm |