2008 Honda HR-V vs. 1963 Isuzu Bellel
To start off, 2008 Honda HR-V is newer by 45 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Isuzu Bellel. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Isuzu Bellel would be higher. At 1,991 cc (4 cylinders), 1963 Isuzu Bellel is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1963 Isuzu Bellel weights approximately 75 kg more than 2008 Honda HR-V.
Because 2008 Honda HR-V is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1963 Isuzu Bellel. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2008 Honda HR-V will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2008 Honda HR-V (135 Nm @ 3500 RPM) has 14 more torque (in Nm) than 1963 Isuzu Bellel. (121 Nm @ 2200 RPM). This means 2008 Honda HR-V will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1963 Isuzu Bellel.
Compare all specifications:
2008 Honda HR-V | 1963 Isuzu Bellel | |
Make | Honda | Isuzu |
Model | HR-V | Bellel |
Year Released | 2008 | 1963 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1590 cc | 1991 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 55 HP |
Torque | 135 Nm | 121 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3500 RPM | 2200 RPM |
Engine Compression Ratio | 9.4:1 | 8.7:1 |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 1257 kg | 1332 kg |
Vehicle Width | 1690 mm | 1700 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2460 mm | 2540 mm |