2008 Honda HR-V vs. 1967 Mercury Park Lane
To start off, 2008 Honda HR-V is newer by 41 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1967 Mercury Park Lane. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1967 Mercury Park Lane would be higher. At 6,990 cc (8 cylinders), 1967 Mercury Park Lane is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1967 Mercury Park Lane weights approximately 103 kg more than 2008 Honda HR-V.
Because 2008 Honda HR-V is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1967 Mercury Park Lane. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2008 Honda HR-V will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1967 Mercury Park Lane (626 Nm @ 2800 RPM) has 491 more torque (in Nm) than 2008 Honda HR-V. (135 Nm @ 3500 RPM). This means 1967 Mercury Park Lane will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2008 Honda HR-V.
Compare all specifications:
2008 Honda HR-V | 1967 Mercury Park Lane | |
Make | Honda | Mercury |
Model | HR-V | Park Lane |
Year Released | 2008 | 1967 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1590 cc | 6990 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 340 HP |
Torque | 135 Nm | 626 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3500 RPM | 2800 RPM |
Engine Compression Ratio | 9.4:1 | 10.5:1 |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
Vehicle Weight | 1257 kg | 1360 kg |
Vehicle Width | 1690 mm | 1990 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2460 mm | 3130 mm |