2008 Honda HR-V vs. 1967 NSU Ro 80
To start off, 2008 Honda HR-V is newer by 41 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1967 NSU Ro 80. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1967 NSU Ro 80 would be higher. At 2,390 cc, 1967 NSU Ro 80 is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2008 Honda HR-V weights approximately 47 kg more than 1967 NSU Ro 80.
Because 2008 Honda HR-V is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1967 NSU Ro 80. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2008 Honda HR-V will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1967 NSU Ro 80 (162 Nm @ 4500 RPM) has 27 more torque (in Nm) than 2008 Honda HR-V. (135 Nm @ 3500 RPM). This means 1967 NSU Ro 80 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2008 Honda HR-V. 1967 NSU Ro 80 has automatic transmission and 2008 Honda HR-V has manual transmission. 2008 Honda HR-V will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 1967 NSU Ro 80 will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
2008 Honda HR-V | 1967 NSU Ro 80 | |
Make | Honda | NSU |
Model | HR-V | Ro 80 |
Year Released | 2008 | 1967 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1590 cc | 2390 cc |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 114 HP |
Torque | 135 Nm | 162 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3500 RPM | 4500 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | 4WD | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1257 kg | 1210 kg |
Vehicle Width | 1690 mm | 1770 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2460 mm | 2870 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 55 L | 37 L |