2008 Honda HR-V vs. 2007 Holden Epica
To start off, 2008 Honda HR-V is newer by 1 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2007 Holden Epica. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2007 Holden Epica would be higher. At 2,492 cc (6 cylinders), 2007 Holden Epica is equipped with a bigger engine.
Because 2008 Honda HR-V is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2007 Holden Epica. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2008 Honda HR-V will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2007 Holden Epica (237 Nm) has 102 more torque (in Nm) than 2008 Honda HR-V. (135 Nm). This means 2007 Holden Epica will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2008 Honda HR-V.
Compare all specifications:
| 2008 Honda HR-V | 2007 Holden Epica | |
| Make | Honda | Holden |
| Model | HR-V | Epica |
| Year Released | 2008 | 2007 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1590 cc | 2492 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 153 HP |
| Torque | 135 Nm | 237 Nm |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 4 doors | 4 doors |
| Vehicle Width | 1690 mm | 1810 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2460 mm | 2700 mm |
| Fuel Consumption Overall | 8.6 L/100km | 9.3 L/100km |
