2008 Honda HR-V vs. 2012 Holden UTE
To start off, 2012 Holden UTE is newer by 4 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2008 Honda HR-V. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2008 Honda HR-V would be higher. At 3,600 cc (6 cylinders), 2012 Holden UTE is equipped with a bigger engine.
Because 2008 Honda HR-V is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2012 Holden UTE. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2008 Honda HR-V will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2012 Holden UTE (350 Nm) has 215 more torque (in Nm) than 2008 Honda HR-V. (135 Nm). This means 2012 Holden UTE will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2008 Honda HR-V.
Compare all specifications:
| 2008 Honda HR-V | 2012 Holden UTE | |
| Make | Honda | Holden |
| Model | HR-V | UTE |
| Year Released | 2008 | 2012 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1590 cc | 3600 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 281 HP |
| Torque | 135 Nm | 350 Nm |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
| Number of Doors | 4 doors | 2 doors |
