2008 Honda Jazz vs. 1949 Volvo PV 60
To start off, 2008 Honda Jazz is newer by 59 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1949 Volvo PV 60. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1949 Volvo PV 60 would be higher. At 3,670 cc (6 cylinders), 1949 Volvo PV 60 is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1949 Volvo PV 60 weights approximately 640 kg more than 2008 Honda Jazz.
Because 1949 Volvo PV 60 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1949 Volvo PV 60. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2008 Honda Jazz, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2008 Honda Jazz | 1949 Volvo PV 60 | |
| Make | Honda | Volvo |
| Model | Jazz | PV 60 |
| Year Released | 2008 | 1949 |
| Engine Size | 1495 cc | 3670 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 85 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Vehicle Weight | 990 kg | 1630 kg |
| Wheelbase Size | 2460 mm | 2850 mm |
