2008 Honda Jazz vs. 1970 Volvo 164
To start off, 2008 Honda Jazz is newer by 38 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1970 Volvo 164. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1970 Volvo 164 would be higher. At 2,978 cc (6 cylinders), 1970 Volvo 164 is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1970 Volvo 164 weights approximately 400 kg more than 2008 Honda Jazz.
Because 1970 Volvo 164 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1970 Volvo 164. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2008 Honda Jazz, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1970 Volvo 164 (210 Nm @ 2500 RPM) has 91 more torque (in Nm) than 2008 Honda Jazz. (119 Nm @ 2800 RPM). This means 1970 Volvo 164 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2008 Honda Jazz.
Compare all specifications:
2008 Honda Jazz | 1970 Volvo 164 | |
Make | Honda | Volvo |
Model | Jazz | 164 |
Year Released | 2008 | 1970 |
Body Type | Hatchback | Sedan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1339 cc | 2978 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 129 HP |
Torque | 119 Nm | 210 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2800 RPM | 2500 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 960 kg | 1360 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4940 mm | 4720 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1480 mm | 1450 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2460 mm | 2730 mm |