2008 Honda Jazz vs. 1997 Lotus Elise
To start off, 2008 Honda Jazz is newer by 11 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1997 Lotus Elise. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1997 Lotus Elise would be higher. At 1,796 cc (4 cylinders), 1997 Lotus Elise is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1997 Lotus Elise (117 HP @ 5500 RPM) has 35 more horse power than 2008 Honda Jazz. (82 HP @ 5700 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1997 Lotus Elise should accelerate faster than 2008 Honda Jazz. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2008 Honda Jazz weights approximately 284 kg more than 1997 Lotus Elise.
Because 1997 Lotus Elise is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1997 Lotus Elise. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2008 Honda Jazz, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1997 Lotus Elise (169 Nm @ 3000 RPM) has 50 more torque (in Nm) than 2008 Honda Jazz. (119 Nm @ 2800 RPM). This means 1997 Lotus Elise will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2008 Honda Jazz. 2008 Honda Jazz has automatic transmission and 1997 Lotus Elise has manual transmission. 1997 Lotus Elise will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2008 Honda Jazz will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
2008 Honda Jazz | 1997 Lotus Elise | |
Make | Honda | Lotus |
Model | Jazz | Elise |
Year Released | 2008 | 1997 |
Body Type | Hatchback | Roadster |
Engine Position | Front | Middle |
Engine Size | 1339 cc | 1796 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 82 HP | 117 HP |
Engine RPM | 5700 RPM | 5500 RPM |
Torque | 119 Nm | 169 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2800 RPM | 3000 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 73 mm | 80 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 80 mm | 89.4 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 10.8:1 | 10.5:1 |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 989 kg | 705 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4940 mm | 3730 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1680 mm | 1710 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1530 mm | 1210 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2460 mm | 2310 mm |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 5.9 L/100km | 13.3 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 42 L | 40 L |