2008 Hummer H3 vs. 1952 Riley RM A
To start off, 2008 Hummer H3 is newer by 56 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1952 Riley RM A. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1952 Riley RM A would be higher. At 3,653 cc (5 cylinders), 2008 Hummer H3 is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2008 Hummer H3 weights approximately 996 kg more than 1952 Riley RM A.
Because 2008 Hummer H3 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1952 Riley RM A. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2008 Hummer H3 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2008 Hummer H3 | 1952 Riley RM A | |
Make | Hummer | Riley |
Model | H3 | RM A |
Year Released | 2008 | 1952 |
Engine Size | 3653 cc | 1496 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 5 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 0 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 2231 kg | 1235 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5180 mm | 4560 mm |
Vehicle Height | 2020 mm | 1550 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2850 mm | 2870 mm |