2008 Hummer H3 vs. 1962 Jeep Grand Wagoneer
To start off, 2008 Hummer H3 is newer by 46 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1962 Jeep Grand Wagoneer. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1962 Jeep Grand Wagoneer would be higher. At 5,328 cc (8 cylinders), 2008 Hummer H3 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2008 Hummer H3 (300 HP @ 5200 RPM) has 181 more horse power than 1962 Jeep Grand Wagoneer. (119 HP @ 3450 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2008 Hummer H3 should accelerate faster than 1962 Jeep Grand Wagoneer.
Both vehicles are four wheel drive (4WD) - it offers better handling, traction, and control in all driving conditions compared with front wheel drive or rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2008 Hummer H3 (434 Nm @ 4000 RPM) has 118 more torque (in Nm) than 1962 Jeep Grand Wagoneer. (316 Nm @ 2000 RPM). This means 2008 Hummer H3 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1962 Jeep Grand Wagoneer.
Compare all specifications:
| 2008 Hummer H3 | 1962 Jeep Grand Wagoneer | |
| Make | Hummer | Jeep |
| Model | H3 | Grand Wagoneer |
| Year Released | 2008 | 1962 |
| Body Type | SUV | SUV |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 5328 cc | 4980 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 300 HP | 119 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5200 RPM | 3450 RPM |
| Torque | 434 Nm | 316 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 4000 RPM | 2000 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | 4WD | 4WD |
| Vehicle Length | 4750 mm | 4670 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 2180 mm | 1930 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1900 mm | 1670 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2850 mm | 2800 mm |
