2008 Hummer H3 vs. 1965 Triumph 2000
To start off, 2008 Hummer H3 is newer by 43 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1965 Triumph 2000. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1965 Triumph 2000 would be higher. At 3,653 cc (5 cylinders), 2008 Hummer H3 is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2008 Hummer H3 weights approximately 1061 kg more than 1965 Triumph 2000.
Let's talk about torque, 2008 Hummer H3 (328 Nm @ 4600 RPM) has 170 more torque (in Nm) than 1965 Triumph 2000. (158 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 2008 Hummer H3 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1965 Triumph 2000.
Compare all specifications:
2008 Hummer H3 | 1965 Triumph 2000 | |
Make | Hummer | Triumph |
Model | H3 | 2000 |
Year Released | 2008 | 1965 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3653 cc | 1997 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 5 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 89 HP |
Torque | 328 Nm | 158 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4600 RPM | 3000 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 95.5 mm | 74.7 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 102 mm | 76 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 10.0:1 | 9.3:1 |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 2231 kg | 1170 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5180 mm | 4420 mm |
Vehicle Height | 2020 mm | 1430 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2850 mm | 2700 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 87 L | 64 L |