2008 Hummer H3 vs. 1996 Jeep Grand Cherokee
To start off, 2008 Hummer H3 is newer by 12 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1996 Jeep Grand Cherokee. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1996 Jeep Grand Cherokee would be higher. At 3,963 cc (6 cylinders), 1996 Jeep Grand Cherokee is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2008 Hummer H3 weights approximately 583 kg more than 1996 Jeep Grand Cherokee.
Both vehicles are four wheel drive (4WD) - it offers better handling, traction, and control in all driving conditions compared with front wheel drive or rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2008 Hummer H3 (328 Nm) has 23 more torque (in Nm) than 1996 Jeep Grand Cherokee. (305 Nm). This means 2008 Hummer H3 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1996 Jeep Grand Cherokee.
Compare all specifications:
2008 Hummer H3 | 1996 Jeep Grand Cherokee | |
Make | Hummer | Jeep |
Model | H3 | Grand Cherokee |
Year Released | 2008 | 1996 |
Body Type | SUV | SUV |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3653 cc | 3963 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 5 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 185 HP |
Torque | 328 Nm | 305 Nm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | 4WD | 4WD |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 2231 kg | 1648 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5180 mm | 4490 mm |
Vehicle Height | 2020 mm | 1650 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2850 mm | 2700 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 87 L | 87 L |