2008 Hummer H3 vs. 2002 MCC Crossblade
To start off, 2008 Hummer H3 is newer by 6 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2002 MCC Crossblade. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2002 MCC Crossblade would be higher. At 3,653 cc (5 cylinders), 2008 Hummer H3 is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2008 Hummer H3 weights approximately 1491 kg more than 2002 MCC Crossblade.
Because 2008 Hummer H3 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2002 MCC Crossblade. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2008 Hummer H3 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2008 Hummer H3 (328 Nm @ 4600 RPM) has 226 more torque (in Nm) than 2002 MCC Crossblade. (102 Nm @ 3210 RPM). This means 2008 Hummer H3 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2002 MCC Crossblade.
Compare all specifications:
2008 Hummer H3 | 2002 MCC Crossblade | |
Make | Hummer | MCC |
Model | H3 | Crossblade |
Year Released | 2008 | 2002 |
Engine Size | 3653 cc | 599 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 5 cylinders | 3 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 70 HP |
Torque | 328 Nm | 102 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4600 RPM | 3210 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 2231 kg | 740 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5180 mm | 2630 mm |
Vehicle Height | 2020 mm | 1520 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2850 mm | 1810 mm |