2008 Hyundai Atos vs. 1996 Rover 200
To start off, 2008 Hyundai Atos is newer by 12 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1996 Rover 200. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1996 Rover 200 would be higher. At 1,589 cc (4 cylinders), 1996 Rover 200 is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1996 Rover 200 weights approximately 268 kg more than 2008 Hyundai Atos.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1996 Rover 200 (137 Nm @ 5200 RPM) has 50 more torque (in Nm) than 2008 Hyundai Atos. (87 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 1996 Rover 200 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2008 Hyundai Atos.
Compare all specifications:
2008 Hyundai Atos | 1996 Rover 200 | |
Make | Hyundai | Rover |
Model | Atos | 200 |
Year Released | 2008 | 1996 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1086 cc | 1589 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 3 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 108 HP |
Torque | 87 Nm | 137 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3000 RPM | 5200 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 797 kg | 1065 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4290 mm | 3980 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1480 mm | 1430 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2390 mm | 2510 mm |